HHO 68 Mustang FB

•July 17, 2008 • Leave a Comment



Every School boys dream roadster… well, that was during the 80’s.

There was a time when almost all these classic muscle cars almost died… it was during the energy crisis of the late 70’s and the late 80’s.

Now… for another time… this late 2000’s, oil price hit an all time high and speculations are seeing it on the USD200. per barrel range.

For a very few people… owning a V8 Muscle Car Classic is again seeing some bright lights.

There’s hope for these classics and in the meantime… let’s daydream about it… allow me to share with you this 3D renderings of the 1968 Mustang Fastback… HHO equipped.

More pics to be uploaded soon!

Hyundai Unveils First Hydrogen-Powered Tucson SUV at Greater Los Angeles Auto Show

•July 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment


Hyundai’s second-generation fuel cell vehicle, based on the Tucson SUV, was unveiled at the Los Angeles Auto Show. (PRNewsFoto)

LOS ANGELES, CA USA

Tucson Fuel Cell Vehicle Will Initiate Fleet Testing Program

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 5 /PRNewswire/ — Hyundai Motor Co.’s fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) program today unveiled its second-generation fuel cell vehicle, the Tucson FCEV, at the Greater Los Angeles Auto Show. The Tucson FCEV is Hyundai’s first hydrogen-powered vehicle taking part in fleet operations to begin in the first quarter of 2005.

(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20050105/LAW100)

Hyundai’s second-generation fuel cell vehicle is dramatically improved in almost every way. The Tucson FCEV has a driving range double that of Hyundai’s first-generation vehicle, the Santa Fe FCEV. Maximum speed and power have both increased to improve the overall performance. In a major technology breakthrough, the Tucson FCEV is one of the first fuel cell vehicles capable of starting in freezing temperatures. Testing has proven that the vehicle is capable of starting after being subjected to -20 degrees Celsius temperatures for five days. Other technical advancements include a higher output fuel cell and a new lithium ion polymer battery. “These advances in our fuel cell electric vehicles are exciting steps forward for our program,” said Kim Sang-Kwon, president of research and
development for Hyundai-Kia Motors. “The Tucson FCEV is proof that Hyundai
has significantly improved efficiency and quality control in the manufacturing
process.”

With this working model, Hyundai will be taking its fuel cell technology “to the fleets” and will begin fleet testing in just three months. Fleets will eventually operate out of AC Transit of Oakland, Calif., Hyundai America Technical Center and Southern California Edison.

The fleet testing phase of Hyundai’s fuel cell research and development program is supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). A team consisting of ChevronTexaco Corp., Hyundai Motor Co. and UTC Fuel Cells was awarded federal funds to lead a five-year demonstration and validation project designed to showcase practical applications of hydrogen energy technology. The primary goal of this multi-year project is to develop and demonstrate safe, convenient and reliable hydrogen-based distributed power generation, fuel cell vehicles and vehicle fueling infrastructure, and to educate key audiences about the use of hydrogen as a potential fuel for transportation and power generation.

“Entering this new phase of our program will allow us to build fuel cell electric vehicles at higher volumes for fleet testing applications,” said President Kim. “It also brings us one step closer to the commercialization of fuel cell vehicles.”

About the Tucson FCEV

Built with lightweight, performance-boosting aluminum body components, the Tucson FCEV has a power-to-weight ratio similar to that of a conventional SUV. It also features low noise levels plus a roomy cabin that offers the same level of comfort and convenience as its gasoline-powered sibling.

Unlike the Santa Fe FCEV, the Tucson Fuel Cell program has been running on a parallel path with the conventional Tucson providing fully digitized engineering data from the earliest stages.

The Tucson FCEV’s power plant has been relocated under the front hood, unlike its predecessor, which featured an under-floor installation. In addition, the Tucson FCEV is capable of starting and operating in sub-zero temperatures.

Tucson FCEV’s driving range has also been extended to 300 km (186 miles) thanks to its 152-liter (40-gallon) hydrogen storage tanks developed by Dynetek Industries Ltd. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. By contrast, the Santa Fe FCEV lacks cold weather start capability and is equipped with a 72-liter fuel tank.

Marginally lighter than its predecessor, the Tucson FCEV also gets five more kW of power for a peak output of 80kW. Its maximum speed is rated at 150km/h (93 mph) compared to the Santa Fe’s 124km/h (77 mph).

As in the Santa Fe FCEV, Hyundai has once again partnered with UTC Fuel Cells of South Windsor, Connecticut, which will supply the hydrogen-powered fuel cell. Enova Systems, of Torrance, Calif., has been tapped to provide the next generation hybrid-electric drive train, motor and control unit. The Hyundai Tucson FCEV 152-V high voltage battery was co-developed by Hyundai Motor Co. and LG Chem in Seoul, Korea.

Hyundai formed its first fuel cell task force team in 2000 and by October of the same year, it unveiled the Santa Fe FCEV, its first prototype fuel cell vehicle. Hyundai has been an active member in the California Fuel Cell Partnership (CaFCP) in Sacramento, Calif. for five years. Past-generation Hyundai fuel cell vehicles have participated in numerous CaFCP Road Rallies and Michelin Challenge Bibendums where Hyundai has won gold and silver awards in a variety of categories.

About Hyundai Motor Co.
Established in 1967, Hyundai Motor Co. has grown into the Hyundai-Kia Automotive Group, which includes over two dozen auto-related subsidiaries and affiliates. Employing over 50,000 people worldwide, Hyundai Motor posted US$20.8 billion in sales in 2003 (on a non-consolidated basis). Hyundai motor vehicles are sold in 193 countries through some 5000 dealerships and showrooms. Further information about Hyundai Motor Co. and its products is available on the Internet at http://www.hyundai-motor.com.

SOURCE Hyundai Motor Co.

Hydrogen car powers to record finish

•July 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment

A special hydrogen-powered car invented by Swiss scientists has set a new world record.

The PAC 11 car came in first at the recent Shell Eco-Marathon in Ladoux, France, completing a 25-kilometre circuit using only one gram of hydrogen.

This converts to about 5,385 kilometres per litre of petrol, a new world record in economical fuel consumption, and means that PAC-Car would only use eight litres to drive around the globe.

At the marathon, 25 cars, travelling at a minimum average speed of 30kmph, competed for the best fuel efficiency title.

The groundbreaking model was developed by a team of 20 mechanical engineering students at the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich.

Team leader Lino Guzzella outlined the winning formula: “Lightweight design, aerodynamics, controls, power electronics, chemistry – the real hard engineering stuff.”

He said the prestigious prize was a great boost for the institute, and would help his department to attract talented students in years to come.

“It’s a beacon signal that I am sending out, so that people know something very good is going on here,” he told swissinfo.
Hot Rod

The PAC car is less than three metres long and resembles a competition bob sleigh with wheels.

The diminutive driver at the Shell competition, Fanny Frei, weighs 45 kilograms.

She had to lie horizontally inside the cockpit, with her head slightly raised so that she could see the control panel, which helped her to maintain an optimal speed to minimise hydrogen consumption.

A hand-held unit encompasses the accelerator and simple bicycle style breaks.

“The race was fun, but it was very hot,” Frei said. “The outside temperature was 30 degrees Celsius, so it must have been 50°C inside the cockpit.”
How it works

PAC stands for “pile à combustible” – in other words, fuel cell. This takes in hydrogen and air, and uses an AC/DC converter to provide the energy needed to drive the two motors.

Two one-litre hydrogen cartridges are tucked inside the back of the vehicle, each containing 11 standard litres of hydrogen, pressurised at 11 bars.

Florian Kolb, who worked on the optimisation of the fuel cell, says the amount of hydrogen carried on board is flexible.

“You could use a tank of up to 200 bars and store 200 litres in such a bottle, so the range could be extended a lot.”

But hydrogen is highly explosive, so safety tests had to be carried out before the system could be put to use. “It’s quite explosive but if the car were to crash, the gas would just dissipate. It’s one-twentieth the weight of air, so it’s gone before it explodes,” said Kolb.
ETH team, with the PAC-Car, following victory at Shell Eco Marathon
ETH team, with the PAC-Car, following victory at Shell Eco Marathon (swissinfo)
Drag Factor

One of the winning features of PAC-Car 11 is its aerodynamics.

“The aerodynamic drag of Pac Car 1 was about 50 per cent of the whole drag,” said Nicolas Weidmann, who was in charge of redesigning an earlier model, PAC Car 1.

“We were able to improve the resistance on the new car, and it is now only a fourth of the amount of drag of the earlier model,” he added.

He achieved this by tilting the wheels by eight degrees, as a compromise between rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag.

Wind tunnel tests were carried out on the vehicle at the Federal Institute of Technology and Ruag Aerodynamics in Emmen, where there is a rolling floor.
Promoting clean cars

The project’s main sponsor was the Federal Energy Office, which is hoping to promote energy efficient systems and renewable energy.

“The PAC car is an ideal training platform for the students, and the project helps to make the public more aware of the importance of greater fuel efficiency,” said Martin Pulver.

But the expert on rational energy use estimates that Switzerland is decades away from developing the PAC-Car on a commercial scale, because hydrogen is not produced industrially and cannot be easily stored.

The government and parliament are at odds over the introduction of “climate” taxes on petrol and diesel imports from next January.

It’s part of Swiss efforts to honour the Kyoto protocol, by reducing carbon dioxide emissions to ten per cent below 1990 levels by 2010.

These levies are expected to generate almost SFr100 million ($78 million), about a third of which will be directed to traffic improvement projects.

“We can use this money to promote research into and boost markets for energy-efficient cars,” Pulver said.

swissinfo, Julie Hunt in Zurich

World’s first hydrogen-powered racecar debut

•July 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment


World’s first hydrogen powered racing car, sponsored by RSC

16 July 2007

Pictured making its debut at Silverstone: the world’s first hydrogen-powered racing car, sponsored by the Royal Society of Chemistry.

World’s first hydrogen powered racing car, sponsored by RSC
World’s first hydrogen powered racing car, sponsored by RSC

© Picture courtesy of the Press Association

The car will be a major feature of this year’s National RSC Chemistry Week Tour in November which will include a low-carbon road show taking in nine venues including the University of Hertfordshire, where a specialist unit has designed and built the vehicle. More details of Chemistry Week and the racing car sponsorship are available from Pauline Meakins at the RSC .

The new car, which can touch 130 mph and accelerate from 0-60 in 3.2 seconds, was demonstrated at the grand prix circuit as part of the Formula Student race weekend organised by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.

The university reports that the car will produce zero carbon dioxide emissions, will be fuelled by hydrogen from farm waste and will be equally as fast as a petrol-fuelled vehicle.

It was made in the university’s new Sustainable Energy Technologies Centre at Hatfield, a campus which has for decades produced talent entering the UK and international automotive industries. The university now has at least one graduate working on every Formula 1 racing team.

Team member John Goddard, working on his UH PhD said this week: “Usually if a car is run on hydrogen we would expect it to lose performance but in this case we have found a way to get optimum performance from the engine.”
Contact and Further Information

Brian Emsley
Media Relations Manager
Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BA
Tel: +44 (0)20 7440 3317 or +44 (0) 7966 939257
Fax: +44 (0)20 7437 8883
Email: Brian Emsley

Pauline Meakins
External Promotions Manager
Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WF
Tel: +44 (0) 1223 432266
Email: Pauline Meakins

•July 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment



The BMW HR2 hybrid car performs with an output of 285 hp and with a top speed on 185 mph. Acceleration from zero to 60 mph takes approximately six seconds. The land speed records involve a list of eight other flying start and standing start categories. Based on technology used in the BMW 760i vehicle, the HR2 also uses the fully variable VALVETRONIC valve drive.

The BMW HR2 hybrid car is a prototype racecar only and will not be hitting the showrooms. The technology learned by creating the HR2 will be used on upcoming production models, though. According to BMW, “BMW will launch a dual-mode version of the current 7 Series during the production cycle of the present model, thus introducing the first car of its kind able to run on both hydrogen and gasoline.”

BMW had better hope that the hydrogen highway happens sooner rather than later, so that it doesn’t miss sales from the gasoline-electric hybrid market that will be blooming over the next 5 or so years. BMW is banking on hydrogen, though, so when H2 does start fueling the economy, the HR2 will be ready.

World’s first hydrogen-powered racecar to debut this weekend

•July 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment

July 15, 2007 Alternative engine technologies face several challenges in the battle to be viewed as a serious alternative to the internal combustion engine – and a key hurdle is the perception that they can’t deliver enough power and performance to compete with their fossil http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOSSIL -fuel burning counterparts. How better to dispel such fears than to race a hydrogen-powered car against petrol-powered competitors? The first hydrogen-powered race car will take to the track this weekend in the worldwide Formula Student category, and if the notion of green car racing Racing-Vintage-Cars catches on, we can look forward to watching the ingenuity of the racing community making some significant contributions to the development of emission-free consumer cars in the near future.

A £5,000 grant from the Royal Society of Chemistry has made it possible for John Goddard and James Waters, two PhD students in the University of Hertfordshire’s new Sustainable Energy Technologies Centre to convert a Formula Student racing car into a hydrogen-powered vehicle. Formula Student is a worldwide challenge for engineering students to design and build small, single-seat racing cars http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racing_Cars . It forms part of their academic studies and culminates in a competition to be held this weekend where teams from all over the world test the strength of their designs in the racing arena.

This is the first time that a hydrogen-powered racing car has been developed anywhere in the world. It will produce zero CO2 emissions Green-Business-Travel , run on ‘green’ hydrogen produced from farm waste and is expected to be equally as fast as a petrol-fueled car.

The engineers are very optimistic about the car’s chances in the Institution of Mechanical Engineers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_engineering (IMechE) Formula Student Race when it races on Saturday 14 and Sunday 15 July at Silverstone. This particular car, before the hydrogen conversion, won the Best UK Car category in the competition in 2005.

“Usually if a car is run on hydrogen, we would expect it to lose performance,” said John. “But, in this case, we have found a way to get optimum performance from the engine.”

“We have had to work with the IMechE to develop a whole new set of rules and guidelines for hydrogen cars because this has never been done before,” James added.

The University set up the Sustainable Energies Technology Centre in December 2006 to develop research into sustainable technologies and other uses of hydrogen.

The hydrogen-powered car will be a key feature of the Royal Society of Chemistry Week which will take place from 3-11 November. For further information, please visit the Royal Society of Chemistry website.

We wish these innovators the best of luck for a great result in the weekend’s racing.

Hydrogen Powered Ford Fussion

•July 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment


The Ford Fusion Hydrogen 999 has set a speed record for a production-based hydrogen-fuel-cell race car with a run of 207.279 mph at the Bonneville Salt Flats. The vehicle, designed and built in collaboration with Ohio State University, Ballard Power Systems, and Roush, was piloted on its record run by Ford retiree and veteran Bonneville racer Rick Byrnes.

Rick Byrnes with the Ford Fusion Hydrogen 999

The Fusion 999 is the first vehicle of its kind. Ford says it was created to advance fuel-cell-powered vehicles and to accomplish a feat that had never been attempted before.

It’s all about Air

•July 16, 2008 • Leave a Comment


Fuel Injection Diagnosis: It’s All About the Air

By Bernie Thompson | July 2008

An engine can’t run without fuel and air. But how much fuel and how much air are needed to make it run efficiently?

A flash of sunlight reflected off the ice hammer’s head as it swung forward, breaking through the age-old ice. Normally this would have made a loud noise, but the only noise that Edmund heard was his own heart racing. The lack of oxygen had every muscle in his body aching in agony as he took his next step up the mountain. He thought to himself, Just a few more steps and I’ll be standing on top of the world. He had dreamed of the day he would reach the top of Mount Everest. On May 29, 1953, Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay had reached the highest point on earth, some 29,029 ft. above sea level. At this elevation there is very little oxygen in the atmosphere, and this climb had been accomplished without the aid of bottled oxygen. The amount of oxygen that’s contained in the atmosphere is important because it’s this oxygen that’s taken in by our bodies and converted chemically to give us the energy we need to do work. A similar release of energy is what powers the internal combustion engine.

In order for this combustion energy to be released, a chemical reaction must take place between oxygen and the hydrocarbons in the fuel. This chemical reaction is based on the weight mass of the two elements—oxygen and hydrocarbons—that react together. In the spark ignition internal combustion engine, this weight ratio can change from 11:1 under a power demand to 17:1 in a lean cruise condition. At both weight ratio extremes, the tailpipe emissions levels will rise considerably.

Many years ago tailpipe emissions levels were not regulated. As the concern about air quality around large cities grew, government regulations were imposed on vehicle manufacturers. For the manufacturers to meet these emissions regulations, a new technology emerged. This technology employs a method of weighing precisely the air entering the engine and then delivering the correct weight of hydrocarbons or fuel for an engine’s running condition. This technology is referred to as fuel injection.

Fuel injection can be either mechanical or electronic, or a combination of both. This discussion will center on electronic fuel injection for the spark ignition internal combustion engine. There are two basic methods of fuel injection currently used in vehicles—speed density and airflow. It’s important to know which system you’re working on. For example, an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve stuck open on a speed density system produces a lower vacuum reading, which would normally indicate that the engine was under load. Under this condition additional fuel would be added, which would overfuel the engine, so the fuel trim correction would go negative and take fuel away. (More on fuel trim later.) On an airflow system with the same EGR valve problem, the airflow would be read correctly, so no fuel trim correction would be needed.

With the speed density method, an indirect calculation of air weight is made by measuring the intake pressure changes using the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor. This sensor does not directly measure the intake manifold pressure; instead, it measures the displacement of a diaphragm that’s deflected by intake manifold pressure. This intake pressure change is converted by the MAP sensor to an output measurement of pressure in kilopascals (kPa). The change in intake manifold pressure can be used to calculate the load placed on an engine. The MAP sensor accomplishes this by monitoring the intake pressure; as the throttle blade is opened, it allows more air to enter the engine and, thus, changes the pressure from a negative state (vacuum) to one that’s slightly under atmospheric pressure at wide-open throttle.

The MAP sensor is desirable to use because the absolute engine working pressure (vacuum) at idle and light load is unchanged by elevation. At sea level, the barometric pressure is 101 kPa, and a good engine idle pressure is 27 kPa. Therefore, the engine vacuum is 101 kPa 2 27 kPa 5 74 kPa, or 29.9 in./Hg 2 10 in./Hg 5 19.9 in./Hg. At 5500 ft. of elevation, the barometric pressure is 84 kPa and a good engine idle pressure is 27 kPa. Therefore, the engine vacuum is 84 kPa 2 27 kPa 5 57 kPa, or 24.9 in./Hg 2 10 in./Hg 5 14.9 in./Hg.

An equation is needed to calculate the airflow into the engine, and certain values must be known: the size of the engine in liters; the intake manifold absolute pressure, as determined by the MAP sensor; and the revolutions per minute (rpm), because in a four-stroke engine, only one stroke produces incoming air. The rpm is determined by the crankshaft position sensor. This will become a factor since the air mass is what we’re trying to measure. The air temperature will also become a factor because a change in temperature will cause a change in the density of the air. This is read by the intake air temperature (IAT) sensor. At an air temperature of 240°F, the air weighs 1.51 grams per liter (g/L); at an air temperature of 104°F, the air weighs 1.12 g/L—a 35% difference. The speed density base air equation is made with only three sensors and is as follows:

RPM x Liters x MAP x IAT Air Density = Mass Air in g/sec

60 2

With the airflow method, a calculation of air weight can be made that is an indirect measurement or a direct measurement of the air entering the intake manifold, depending on which type of sensor is used. This airflow is measured with a device called a mass airflow (MAF) sensor. There are several styles of these devices, the most popular of which is the heated-element type. It’s based on the hot-wire anemometer weather forecasters use for measuring wind velocity. A wire or element is electrically heated to a set temperature above the temperature of the inlet air. As the throttle blade is opened, the velocity of air increases, which transfers the heat from the element into the air. An electronic circuit is designed to keep the element at a set temperature so that as its temperature decreases, the current flow across it increases. By monitoring the current, the airflow will be known. The PCM converts this signal into air weight, which is read in g/sec.

In either of these methods—speed density or airflow—the air is the unknown quantity; therefore, the air flowing into the engine is what must be determined. Fuel injection is based on airflow, not fuel flow. The fuel delivery weight is a known factor.

One example can be seen by using a 25-lbs./hr. fuel injector. This number is based on the engine’s brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC), which indicates the engine’s fuel consumption efficiency. The BSFC is usually measured in pounds of fuel used per hour for each unit of horsepower. This relationship means that horsepower multiplied by BSFC equals pounds of fuel consumed per hour.

A 25-lbs./hr. fuel injector’s fuel delivery is based on a constant fuel pressure and volume equal to 255cc/min., or .00425cc/millisecond. One cubic centimeter is equal to .162 gram of gasoline. This fuel weight is a known quantity that will be delivered by the fuel injector to the engine.

Now that both the air weight entering the engine and the fuel weight being delivered can be determined, an equation can be derived that will set a precise air/fuel ratio for the engine. The equation is used to determine the air mass weight contained in each cylinder so the fuel weight can be delivered properly. If there were any problems, such as the sensors misreading or incorrect fuel delivery, the base air equation would need to be changed so that the correct air/fuel weight would be maintained. This is done with a multiplier to the base air equation that’s called fuel trim (see Fig. 1 on page 30). The purpose of fuel trim is to monitor the ratio of air to fuel weight and to keep it at a predetermined target value.

An oxygen sensor is located in the exhaust system to continually measure the air/fuel ratio. It’s set up in a feedback loop so it can report the air/fuel ratio to the microprocessor, which will use this information to adjust the fuel trim multiplier to keep the air/fuel ratio at the target value. This method of control is referred to as a closed-loop limit-cycle control system. One example of this type of control system is an oven. When the temperature is set to, say, 350°F, the electrical element comes on to heat the oven. The oven stays on until it reaches a temperature of 355°F, then shuts off. This temperature is sensed by a sensor in the oven. The oven then cools down until it reaches 345°F. At this point the heating element turns on, heating the oven to 355°F again. This cycle continues, to keep the oven close to the target temperature of 350°F.

This type of control system can maintain an average value very close to the command input. On an internal combustion engine, this system works in much the same way. The fuel trim works like the oven’s heating element, driving the system rich or lean. The oxygen sensor works like the heat sensor in the oven, only it reports the air/fuel changes. The oxygen sensor reporting limits are set between .1 and .8 volt. The oxygen sensor in this range is stoichiometric. For this sensor to be rich it must be above .8 volt; to be lean it must be below .1 volt.

A vehicle’s fuel control system under most conditions will cycle the oxygen sensor in this .1- to .8-volt range. This is usually accomplished with Short Term Fuel Trim (STFT). Since STFT drives the oxygen sensor, if the oxygen sensor response is slow, the STFT peak-to-peak value will increase. If the STFT value exceeds 8% peak-to-peak, the O2 sensor will have to be replaced (Fig. 2 on page 32). The cycling oxygen sensor will maintain the air/fuel ratio at 14.66 lbs. of dry air to 1 lb. of gasoline. This is referred to as stoichiometry, which is the ideal mixture of air and fuel that, when ignited, will completely burn all of the hydrocarbons and leave only carbon dioxide and water.

In a running engine, the air/fuel mixture will never completely burn, due in part to unvaporized fuel and hydrocarbons packing into the piston ring lands and the valve pocket areas. This air/fuel ratio is desirable for the catalytic converter to work correctly, thereby lowering the levels of tailpipe emissions.

Now that we have an understanding of the fuel injection fuel control system, let’s put it to work in repairing vehicles. Since the fuel injection system is all about the air, it will be necessary to calculate the volumetric efficiency (VE) of the engine (see Mark Warren’s June 2003 Driveability Corner for a concise explanation of VE). A Toyota 4Runner with a 3.0L engine was brought in because of low power. The Check Engine light came on and the driver complained of low power. The following diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) were pulled: P0171 (system too lean), P0325 (knock sensor 1 circuit) and P0330 (knock sensor 2 circuit).

To find a diagnostic direction quickly it’s necessary to calculate the VE. This can be done by collecting the parameter identifications (PIDs) that will be needed while test driving the vehicle. Once you have the information, just run the VE calculation to see whether the air going into the engine is correct. In this example, the scan tool automatically calculated the volumetric efficiency of the engine while the vehicle was being driven. The yellow trace is the MAF sensor signal that the scan tool reads as grams per second (g/sec) and the red trace is the VE reading, or theoretical airflow. When these two measurements of the air flowing into the engine are compared, it’s easy to see whether a problem exists. In this case, the actual airflow reported from the MAF sensor (yellow trace) is much lower than the VE calculation (red trace). This low MAF reading shows that a problem is present in the airflow to the engine.

A low airflow reading could be associated with many problems, such as a restricted exhaust or intake, an air leak between MAF sensor and throttle, an incorrect MAF sensor calibration, incorrect camshaft timing, engine mechanical faults, etc. To identify what the problem is, it’s necessary to check the fuel trim. When doing this, you must check the trim values over a range of engine load and rpm. In this fuel trim test (Fig. 4), total fuel trim readings are taken. Total fuel trim is Long Term Fuel Trim added to Short Term Fuel Trim. When checking the fuel trim chart, look at the way the fuel trims change over the load of the engine. In this example at idle, the fuel trim is taking away 229% from the base air equation. As the load and rpm change, the fuel trim starts to add +23% to the base air equation. As the load steadily increases, the fuel trim starts to add up to +49% to the base air equation. This indicates that the MAF sensor is dirty. The MAF sensor uses a heated element to measure the incoming air to the engine. When this element becomes dirty it overreads the incoming airflow at idle, so the fuel trim has to modify the base air equation to compensate.

At hot unloaded idle, the MAF sensor reading in g/sec should be very close to the liter size of the engine, so on this 3.0L Toyota, at hot idle the MAF sensor should read about 3 to 3.2 g/sec. This is a good way to see whether the MAF sensor is reading correctly at idle. If the MAF sensor reading in g/sec is higher or lower than the liter size of the engine at idle, check the fuel trim. If the fuel trim is good (610%), then the MAF sensor is reading the airflow correctly.

If the fuel trim is greater than this, it’s an indication of a problem. As the engine load changes, the dirty MAF element cannot give up its heat to the air flowing over it, thus it underreads the airflow. The fuel trim has to correct this airflow reading from the MAF sensor. It does this by multiplying the base air equation by the trim value needed.

Another example of a MAF sensor reading incorrectly is if the MAF sensor’s Wheatstone bridge is out of range, the actual g/sec reading would also be out of range. Since the MAF sensor reading sets the fuel delivery weight, the fuel trim would correct the airflow. This would create out-of-range fuel trims as well. However, there’s a difference in the way the fuel trims load on the chart; rather than going from a negative to a positive value, the fuel trims stay linear. In other words, they stay very close to the same percentages from the bottom of the chart to the top. In this case, the MAF sensor would need to be replaced.

In another example, if the engine has a fuel delivery problem, the MAF sensor reading would be correct but the fuel trims would read out-of-range. Whether the fuel trims are positive or negative tells you which direction to go. When they’re negative (taking away fuel), there’s too much fuel getting to the engine. When they’re positive (adding fuel), there’s not enough fuel getting to the engine. If the engine has a misfire with low fuel trim values, the problem could be the ignition system or engine mechanical. If the engine has a misfire with high fuel trim values, look at a possible problem with the injectors.

Now back to our 3.0L Toyota’s MAF sensor problem. The sensor was removed and cleaned, repairing not only the P0171, but the P0325 and P0330. Rechecking the work you’ve done is important, as it verifies that the repair has corrected the problem. This entire diagnosis was made while on a test drive.

So the next time you go for a test drive, take your scan tool with you. It may save you hours of diagnostic time later. Also, remember the lesson of Mount Everest: In an internal combustion engine, just as in our bodies, the amount of available air determines the amount of work that can be done.

Free Hydrogen Power

•July 16, 2008 • 1 Comment

Free Hydrogen is not really free… and it is not really for everyone.

The Conspiracy Theorists might have a more darker thoughts about this statement. And the Naysayers… well, they will keep saying ney or nay.

At any rate, I am writing this blog merely for the purpose of sharing information to the worthy seekers, that’s you!

You probably think – there is someone out there who is actually sharing information for free!

Yes I am… and I do not intend to make this a long and uncomfortable read for you.

Don’t worry, I wont be telling you what HHO, Hydrogen, Oxygen, AF Ratios, Thermodynamics, Over Unity, AMPS Draw or anything of that sort here. You probably have bombarded yourself with information in other previous readings.

The question we want to address here is… “Can we actually make our own HHO system in our cars for free?”

Well, the answer is… perhaps it’s not entirely free… but you will be able to Do everything yourself!.

First things first; Materials…

We will be building a small HHO brick… small but strong. With a standard configuration of (+nn-nn+):

1. Stainless Steel 316 or 301 1mm thick plates (2″ x 3″ about 5 pieces) (Hand sanded, drilled with 6mm dia. holes on all 4 corners with about 10mm clearance on the edges.

2. Plastic Bolts and Nuts 4 pcs…. (6mm dia. threads 30mm in length or more) (plastic flat washers about 40 pcs. Plastic Nuts about 8 pcs.)

3. Stainless Steel wire eye terminals… (6.5mm inner diameter .5mm thk.) 3 pcs.

4. Stainless wires (if you can get one) (cut to length)

5. Stainless Steel Bolts and Nuts with flat washers and lock washers (6mm dia. 25mm) about 2 pcs. bolts and washers and 4 pcs. nuts.

6. HDPE Plastic Jar or Container… preferably cylindrical jar with threaded cap or lid. (about 4″ x 4″ x 8″) This will serve as your electrolyser container. (Drill 2 holes for the stainless bolts and 2 holes for the Brass fittings.
(1 Center hole for the HHO Gas output fitting… and one hole near the edge for the other breather inlet fitting. and the two smaller holes for the electrodes with equidistant locations… they need to be far apart but keep a clearance of about 15mm from the edges.

7. Brass Fittings (3/16″ or 1/4″) 2 pcs.

8. Fuel Hose… I recommend those black rubber hose or Vacuum hoses. (cut to length)

9. Automotive Wires with Eye Terminals (number 16, cut to length)

10. Fuse holder with fuse(15 AMPS, in line type)

11. For your bubbler, you may use the plastic (HDPE) reservoir similar to your radiator coolant reservoir.

As soon as you have the above materials in your table… the next step is to build your first Home-made HHO Generator – you can actually use right away!

Please stay tuned for the next article where I will be teaching you a step by step procedure on how you can build you first HHO – Hydrogen on demand module for your car.

Please be patient… and don’t blow things up just yet!

•July 6, 2008 • Leave a Comment

http://s186.photobucket.com/albums/x93/ehnriko/?action=view&current=13166e61.pbw